By: Aditi
Published on: Apr 30, 2025
The age-old adage “Sell in May and go away” is back in the spotlight as investors grapple with a turbulent U.S. stock market in 2025. With the S&P 500 rebounding 12% from April lows but still down 5.5% year-to-date, seasonal trends and geopolitical risks are colliding, leaving traders questioning whether history will repeat itself—or if unprecedented factors like Trump-era tariffs will rewrite the rules.
The “Sell in May” strategy, rooted in decades of market data, suggests that investors should exit equities in May and reinvest in November to capitalize on seasonal strength. According to Bespoke Investment Group, a fund tracking the S&P 500 from November to April yielded a staggering 731% cumulative return since 1993, compared to just 171% for May-October holdings. The pattern held most recently between November 2023 and October 2024, reinforcing its historical credibility.
A longer-term analysis from the Stock Trader’s Almanac paints an even starker picture: Over the past 74 years, the S&P 500 returned a mere 35% during May-October periods versus an eye-popping 11,657% gain in the November-April window. This disparity highlights the seasonal headwinds that often plague summer and early fall trading.
This year, the “Sell in May” debate is complicated by unique challenges:
“The scales are tipped in favor of the ‘May-Sellers’ this year,” Richey warns, citing skewed risks toward another downturn. However, Jay Woods of Freedom Capital Markets cautions, “We’re more held hostage to tariff discussions than any seasonal trend.”
While history favors the “Sell in May” approach, critics argue that long-term investors benefit more from staying the course. Bespoke’s analysis reveals that simply holding the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) since 1993 would have delivered a 2,100% return—a testament to the power of patience.
Key counterpoints to seasonal timing include:
Trump’s tariff pause, set to expire in July, adds complexity. Renewed trade tensions could disrupt supply chains, inflate consumer prices, and spark market volatility—factors that might overshadow seasonal trends.
“We’re in a tariff world now,” Woods emphasizes. “Investors must weigh Washington’s next move more heavily than the calendar.” Recent earnings reports from multinationals like UBS and Société Générale already reflect turbulence from trade policy shifts, with companies citing fluctuating commodity prices and export challenges.
Despite the gloomy seasonal outlook, technical indicators suggest cautious optimism:
However, these signals clash with macroeconomic risks. Friday’s U.S. employment report could sway sentiment further, with strong job growth potentially fueling inflation fears and rate hike speculation.
For those weighing the “Sell in May” strategy, consider these steps:
The “Sell in May” adage offers a compelling historical narrative, but 2025’s unique blend of weak early-year performance, tariff uncertainty, and mixed technical signals demands a nuanced approach. While seasonality tilts odds toward summer weakness, investors must prioritize adaptability in a market increasingly driven by geopolitical winds rather than calendar pages.
As the old Wall Street saying goes, “The trend is your friend—until it bends.” In 2025, the bend may come from Washington, not the seasons.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Leave a Comment