UK Government Borrowing Crisis: Rachel Reeves Faces Mounting Pressure Ahead of Spring Statement

By: Aditi

Published on: Mar 22, 2025

UK Government Borrowing Soars: A Fiscal Tightrope for Rachel Reeves

Chancellor Rachel Reeves enters a pivotal week as official data reveals the UK government borrowed £10.7bn in February 2025 – the fourth-highest February figure since records began in 1993. This overshoot, well above the City’s £7bn forecast, intensifies pressure on the Treasury ahead of next week’s Spring Statement. With public sector net debt hovering at 95.5% of GDP (levels unseen since the 1960s), the Chancellor faces tough decisions to balance fiscal discipline against mounting economic headwinds.

February Borrowing Breakdown: A Closer Look

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported that February’s borrowing figure was nearly unchanged from the same month in 2024. However, cumulative borrowing for the 2024–25 financial year reached £132.2bn – £14.7bn higher than the previous year. Key drivers include:

• Rising Public Spending: Social benefits, healthcare, and infrastructure investments exceeded forecasts.


• Tax Receipts Shortfall: Lower-than-expected self-assessment tax payments failed to offset expenditure.


• Debt Servicing Costs: Higher interest rates on government bonds added £6bn to debt costs compared to 2023.

Jessica Barnaby, ONS Deputy Director for Public Sector Finances, noted, “While monthly borrowing remained stable year-on-year, the cumulative deficit reflects persistent pressures on the UK’s fiscal framework.”

OBR Forecasts and the Spring Statement Dilemma

In October 2024, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) projected annual borrowing of £127.5bn for 2024–25. With just one month remaining in the fiscal year, borrowing has already surpassed this estimate by £4.7bn. The OBR’s updated forecast, due alongside the Spring Statement on March 26, is expected to downgrade growth projections and revise debt targets.

Key Challenges for Rachel Reeves:

1. Fiscal Rules: Reeves’ commitment to balancing the current budget (excluding investment) by 2029–30 leaves minimal room for maneuver.


2. Spending Cuts: The Treasury has signaled “line-by-line” reviews of public spending to redirect funds toward priority sectors like green energy and tech.


3. Tax Policy: Pressure mounts to avoid hikes, but weak growth and high debt servicing costs could force difficult choices.

Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, emphasized: “Sound public finances are non-negotiable. This government will never gamble with fiscal stability.”

Public Debt at 1960s Levels: A Looming Crisis?

Public sector net debt (excluding banks) now stands at £2.6tn, or 95.5% of GDP – a 0.1 percentage point increase from 2024. While lower than post-pandemic peaks (98% in 2023), this marks a 40-year high in debt-to-GDP terms. Analysts warn that without corrective action, debt could breach 100% of GDP by 2026.

Comparative Insights:

• Pre-2008 Crisis: Debt averaged 40% of GDP.


• Post-Pandemic (2023): Peaked at 98% due to COVID-19 stimulus.


• Current Trajectory: Rising welfare costs and sluggish growth threaten long-term sustainability.

Expert Reactions: Warnings and Recommendations

Alison Ring, ICAEW Director of Public Sector and Taxation:
“The Chancellor faces a double bind. Late tax receipts haven’t offset spending overruns, and welfare reforms won’t yield savings soon. She may need to revisit tax policies or accelerate austerity measures.”

Paul Johnson, Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS):
“The UK’s debt trajectory is unsustainable without growth. The Spring Statement must address structural issues – from productivity gaps to an aging population.”

Market Response:

• Gilts: Yields on 10-year UK government bonds rose 0.2% following the data release.


• Sterling: GBP/USD fell 0.45% to 1.28 amid investor caution.

Spring Statement Preview: What to Expect

Reeves’ Spring Statement on March 26 is poised to outline fiscal adjustments to stabilize public finances. Key anticipated measures include:

1. 
   

   Spending Reviews:

   
   
   
   
   • 
     

     Departmental Cuts: Up to 3% reductions for non-priority sectors.

     
     
   
   
   • 
     

     Welfare Reforms: Tightening eligibility criteria for disability and housing benefits.

     
     
   
   
   
   


2. 
   

   Growth Initiatives:

   
   
   
   
   • 
     

     Green Investment: £2bn allocated for renewable energy projects.

     
     
   
   
   • 
     

     Tech Sector Grants: Tax breaks for AI and semiconductor startups.

     
     
   
   
   
   


3. 
   

   Tax Policies:

   
   
   
   
   • 
     

     Capital Gains Tax: Potential alignment with income tax rates.

     
     
   
   
   • 
     

     Windfall Taxes: Extended levies on energy giants’ profits.

     
     
   
   
   
   

Political and Economic Implications

For Labour:
Reeves’ fiscal credibility hinges on meeting debt targets without alienating voters. Critics argue austerity risks repeating post-2010 stagnation, while supporters insist discipline is vital for long-term growth.

For the Economy:

• Growth Forecasts: The OBR may downgrade 2025 GDP growth from 1.2% to 0.8%.


• Inflation: Sticky wage growth and energy prices could delay Bank of England rate cuts.

Global Context:
The UK’s debt ratio exceeds the G7 average (92%) but remains below the US (123%) and Japan (260%). However, weak productivity and Brexit-related trade barriers exacerbate fiscal vulnerabilities.

Conclusion: A Defining Moment for UK Fiscal Policy

Rachel Reeves confronts one of the most challenging Spring Statements in decades. With borrowing overshooting forecasts, debt at historic highs, and growth stagnating, her decisions will shape the UK’s economic trajectory for years. Investors, households, and policymakers alike await clarity on how the Treasury plans to reconcile fiscal prudence with the urgent need for investment.

As Darren Jones asserted, “Securing Britain’s future requires an agile state focused on mission-driven spending.” Whether this vision translates into sustainable growth – or deeper austerity – remains to be seen.